Status of snmp v3

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Status of snmp v3

Mario Luzeiro
Hello all,
I'm testing SNMP sample from LWIP.

What is the status of SNMP V3 implementation in LWIP?
It only misses the user callback implementation or is missing something in the core?

I tried to build with V3 enabled and I got errors on the use of mbedtls_sha1* and mbedtls_md5* functions.
Am I missing some define?

Mario
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Status of snmp v3

Dirk Ziegelmeier-2
it is technically complete, it only needs proper implementation of the functions in

which is the glueing code to your application.

And of course it needs mbedtls in your project, or a reimplentation of

Ciao
Dirk


On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 7:21 PM Mário Luzeiro <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hello all,
I'm testing SNMP sample from LWIP.

What is the status of SNMP V3 implementation in LWIP?
It only misses the user callback implementation or is missing something in the core?

I tried to build with V3 enabled and I got errors on the use of mbedtls_sha1* and mbedtls_md5* functions.
Am I missing some define?

Mario
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Status of snmp v3

Mario Luzeiro
Hi Dirk,

> it is technically complete
thanks for all your work!
I missed a bit some debug output as there are on other modules in LWIP but I am doing some manual debug.


I'm trying to run the example code with v3 and use snmpwalk (linux tool) to test it.
I changed the engine boot and time to be always 0 for test proposes.
I need to change the engineID to 12 octets(bytes) so snmpwalk (and wireshark) will not complain.

The far I can get is running this command and get this result:
$ snmpwalk -v3 -l authPriv -u lwip -a SHA -A "maplesyrup" -x DES -X "maplesyrup" 192.168.1.3 -e 555555555555555555555555 -Z 0,0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 = STRING: "lwIP example"
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 = OID: iso.3.6.1.4.1.26381
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (100158) 0:16:41.58
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.4.0 = STRING: "root"
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.5.0 = STRING: "FQDN-unk"
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.6.0 = STRING: "lwIP development PC"
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.7.0 = INTEGER: 72
iso.3.6.1.2.1.2.1.0 = INTEGER: 1
iso.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.1 = INTEGER: 1
snmpwalk: Authentication failure (incorrect password, community or key)

Why is it getting some data and then in the end reports some authentication failure?
As I don't know about SNMP protocol, I am not sure if thats ok or something is wrong..
Hope you can clarify me.

Mario Luzeiro

________________________________________
From: lwip-users <lwip-users-bounces+mrluzeiro=[hidden email]> on behalf of Dirk Ziegelmeier <[hidden email]>
Sent: 24 September 2019 19:18
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Status of snmp v3

it is technically complete, it only needs proper implementation of the functions in
http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/contrib/examples/snmp/snmp_v3/snmpv3_dummy.c

which is the glueing code to your application.

And of course it needs mbedtls in your project, or a reimplentation of
http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/src/apps/snmp/snmpv3_mbedtls.c

Ciao
Dirk


On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 7:21 PM Mário Luzeiro <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
Hello all,
I'm testing SNMP sample from LWIP.

What is the status of SNMP V3 implementation in LWIP?
It only misses the user callback implementation or is missing something in the core?

I tried to build with V3 enabled and I got errors on the use of mbedtls_sha1* and mbedtls_md5* functions.
Am I missing some define?

Mario
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Status of snmp v3

Dirk Ziegelmeier-2
sorry, I don't have an idea at the moment. I only tested with SnmpB and that worked well.

Ciao
Dirk


On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 1:10 PM Mário Luzeiro <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Dirk,

> it is technically complete
thanks for all your work!
I missed a bit some debug output as there are on other modules in LWIP but I am doing some manual debug.


I'm trying to run the example code with v3 and use snmpwalk (linux tool) to test it.
I changed the engine boot and time to be always 0 for test proposes.
I need to change the engineID to 12 octets(bytes) so snmpwalk (and wireshark) will not complain.

The far I can get is running this command and get this result:
$ snmpwalk -v3 -l authPriv -u lwip -a SHA -A "maplesyrup" -x DES -X "maplesyrup" 192.168.1.3 -e 555555555555555555555555 -Z 0,0
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 = STRING: "lwIP example"
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 = OID: iso.3.6.1.4.1.26381
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (100158) 0:16:41.58
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.4.0 = STRING: "root"
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.5.0 = STRING: "FQDN-unk"
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.6.0 = STRING: "lwIP development PC"
iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.7.0 = INTEGER: 72
iso.3.6.1.2.1.2.1.0 = INTEGER: 1
iso.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.1 = INTEGER: 1
snmpwalk: Authentication failure (incorrect password, community or key)

Why is it getting some data and then in the end reports some authentication failure?
As I don't know about SNMP protocol, I am not sure if thats ok or something is wrong..
Hope you can clarify me.

Mario Luzeiro

________________________________________
From: lwip-users <lwip-users-bounces+mrluzeiro=[hidden email]> on behalf of Dirk Ziegelmeier <[hidden email]>
Sent: 24 September 2019 19:18
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Status of snmp v3

it is technically complete, it only needs proper implementation of the functions in
http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/contrib/examples/snmp/snmp_v3/snmpv3_dummy.c

which is the glueing code to your application.

And of course it needs mbedtls in your project, or a reimplentation of
http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/src/apps/snmp/snmpv3_mbedtls.c

Ciao
Dirk


On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 7:21 PM Mário Luzeiro <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
Hello all,
I'm testing SNMP sample from LWIP.

What is the status of SNMP V3 implementation in LWIP?
It only misses the user callback implementation or is missing something in the core?

I tried to build with V3 enabled and I got errors on the use of mbedtls_sha1* and mbedtls_md5* functions.
Am I missing some define?

Mario
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Status of snmp v3

wilkxt
Hi
A few days ago I started snmpv3 from this example and is work fine.
Only i have my private mib file.

czw., 26 wrz 2019 o 21:07 Dirk Ziegelmeier <[hidden email]> napisał(a):

>
> sorry, I don't have an idea at the moment. I only tested with SnmpB and that worked well.
>
> Ciao
> Dirk
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 1:10 PM Mário Luzeiro <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dirk,
>>
>> > it is technically complete
>> thanks for all your work!
>> I missed a bit some debug output as there are on other modules in LWIP but I am doing some manual debug.
>>
>>
>> I'm trying to run the example code with v3 and use snmpwalk (linux tool) to test it.
>> I changed the engine boot and time to be always 0 for test proposes.
>> I need to change the engineID to 12 octets(bytes) so snmpwalk (and wireshark) will not complain.
>>
>> The far I can get is running this command and get this result:
>> $ snmpwalk -v3 -l authPriv -u lwip -a SHA -A "maplesyrup" -x DES -X "maplesyrup" 192.168.1.3 -e 555555555555555555555555 -Z 0,0
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 = STRING: "lwIP example"
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 = OID: iso.3.6.1.4.1.26381
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (100158) 0:16:41.58
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.4.0 = STRING: "root"
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.5.0 = STRING: "FQDN-unk"
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.6.0 = STRING: "lwIP development PC"
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.7.0 = INTEGER: 72
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.2.1.0 = INTEGER: 1
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.1 = INTEGER: 1
>> snmpwalk: Authentication failure (incorrect password, community or key)
>>
>> Why is it getting some data and then in the end reports some authentication failure?
>> As I don't know about SNMP protocol, I am not sure if thats ok or something is wrong..
>> Hope you can clarify me.
>>
>> Mario Luzeiro
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: lwip-users <lwip-users-bounces+mrluzeiro=[hidden email]> on behalf of Dirk Ziegelmeier <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: 24 September 2019 19:18
>> To: Mailing list for lwIP users
>> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Status of snmp v3
>>
>> it is technically complete, it only needs proper implementation of the functions in
>> http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/contrib/examples/snmp/snmp_v3/snmpv3_dummy.c
>>
>> which is the glueing code to your application.
>>
>> And of course it needs mbedtls in your project, or a reimplentation of
>> http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/src/apps/snmp/snmpv3_mbedtls.c
>>
>> Ciao
>> Dirk
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 7:21 PM Mário Luzeiro <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> I'm testing SNMP sample from LWIP.
>>
>> What is the status of SNMP V3 implementation in LWIP?
>> It only misses the user callback implementation or is missing something in the core?
>>
>> I tried to build with V3 enabled and I got errors on the use of mbedtls_sha1* and mbedtls_md5* functions.
>> Am I missing some define?
>>
>> Mario
>> _______________________________________________
>> lwip-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lwip-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users



--
pozdrawiam
tomek

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Status of snmp v3

Mario Luzeiro
Hi Tomek,
what is your target platform?

________________________________________
From: lwip-users <lwip-users-bounces+mrluzeiro=[hidden email]> on behalf of tomek wilkxt <[hidden email]>
Sent: 27 September 2019 08:39
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Status of snmp v3

Hi
A few days ago I started snmpv3 from this example and is work fine.
Only i have my private mib file.

czw., 26 wrz 2019 o 21:07 Dirk Ziegelmeier <[hidden email]> napisał(a):

>
> sorry, I don't have an idea at the moment. I only tested with SnmpB and that worked well.
>
> Ciao
> Dirk
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 1:10 PM Mário Luzeiro <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dirk,
>>
>> > it is technically complete
>> thanks for all your work!
>> I missed a bit some debug output as there are on other modules in LWIP but I am doing some manual debug.
>>
>>
>> I'm trying to run the example code with v3 and use snmpwalk (linux tool) to test it.
>> I changed the engine boot and time to be always 0 for test proposes.
>> I need to change the engineID to 12 octets(bytes) so snmpwalk (and wireshark) will not complain.
>>
>> The far I can get is running this command and get this result:
>> $ snmpwalk -v3 -l authPriv -u lwip -a SHA -A "maplesyrup" -x DES -X "maplesyrup" 192.168.1.3 -e 555555555555555555555555 -Z 0,0
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 = STRING: "lwIP example"
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 = OID: iso.3.6.1.4.1.26381
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (100158) 0:16:41.58
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.4.0 = STRING: "root"
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.5.0 = STRING: "FQDN-unk"
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.6.0 = STRING: "lwIP development PC"
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.7.0 = INTEGER: 72
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.2.1.0 = INTEGER: 1
>> iso.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.1 = INTEGER: 1
>> snmpwalk: Authentication failure (incorrect password, community or key)
>>
>> Why is it getting some data and then in the end reports some authentication failure?
>> As I don't know about SNMP protocol, I am not sure if thats ok or something is wrong..
>> Hope you can clarify me.
>>
>> Mario Luzeiro
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: lwip-users <lwip-users-bounces+mrluzeiro=[hidden email]> on behalf of Dirk Ziegelmeier <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: 24 September 2019 19:18
>> To: Mailing list for lwIP users
>> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Status of snmp v3
>>
>> it is technically complete, it only needs proper implementation of the functions in
>> http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/contrib/examples/snmp/snmp_v3/snmpv3_dummy.c
>>
>> which is the glueing code to your application.
>>
>> And of course it needs mbedtls in your project, or a reimplentation of
>> http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/src/apps/snmp/snmpv3_mbedtls.c
>>
>> Ciao
>> Dirk
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 7:21 PM Mário Luzeiro <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> I'm testing SNMP sample from LWIP.
>>
>> What is the status of SNMP V3 implementation in LWIP?
>> It only misses the user callback implementation or is missing something in the core?
>>
>> I tried to build with V3 enabled and I got errors on the use of mbedtls_sha1* and mbedtls_md5* functions.
>> Am I missing some define?
>>
>> Mario
>> _______________________________________________
>> lwip-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lwip-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users



--
pozdrawiam
tomek

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Status of snmp v3

wilkxt
> what is your target platform?

first STM32F107 but now GD32f107 is most the same but has more RAM
(96KB) and speed is 108Mhz.
LWIP current with repo
mbedtls-2.11.0.
NO SYS.


> ________________________________________
> From: lwip-users <lwip-users-bounces+mrluzeiro=[hidden email]> on behalf of tomek wilkxt <[hidden email]>
> Sent: 27 September 2019 08:39
> To: Mailing list for lwIP users
> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Status of snmp v3
>
> Hi
> A few days ago I started snmpv3 from this example and is work fine.
> Only i have my private mib file.
>
> czw., 26 wrz 2019 o 21:07 Dirk Ziegelmeier <[hidden email]> napisał(a):
> >
> > sorry, I don't have an idea at the moment. I only tested with SnmpB and that worked well.
> >
> > Ciao
> > Dirk
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 1:10 PM Mário Luzeiro <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Dirk,
> >>
> >> > it is technically complete
> >> thanks for all your work!
> >> I missed a bit some debug output as there are on other modules in LWIP but I am doing some manual debug.
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm trying to run the example code with v3 and use snmpwalk (linux tool) to test it.
> >> I changed the engine boot and time to be always 0 for test proposes.
> >> I need to change the engineID to 12 octets(bytes) so snmpwalk (and wireshark) will not complain.
> >>
> >> The far I can get is running this command and get this result:
> >> $ snmpwalk -v3 -l authPriv -u lwip -a SHA -A "maplesyrup" -x DES -X "maplesyrup" 192.168.1.3 -e 555555555555555555555555 -Z 0,0
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 = STRING: "lwIP example"
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 = OID: iso.3.6.1.4.1.26381
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (100158) 0:16:41.58
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.4.0 = STRING: "root"
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.5.0 = STRING: "FQDN-unk"
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.6.0 = STRING: "lwIP development PC"
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.7.0 = INTEGER: 72
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.2.1.0 = INTEGER: 1
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.1 = INTEGER: 1
> >> snmpwalk: Authentication failure (incorrect password, community or key)
> >>
> >> Why is it getting some data and then in the end reports some authentication failure?
> >> As I don't know about SNMP protocol, I am not sure if thats ok or something is wrong..
> >> Hope you can clarify me.
> >>
> >> Mario Luzeiro
> >>
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: lwip-users <lwip-users-bounces+mrluzeiro=[hidden email]> on behalf of Dirk Ziegelmeier <[hidden email]>
> >> Sent: 24 September 2019 19:18
> >> To: Mailing list for lwIP users
> >> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Status of snmp v3
> >>
> >> it is technically complete, it only needs proper implementation of the functions in
> >> http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/contrib/examples/snmp/snmp_v3/snmpv3_dummy.c
> >>
> >> which is the glueing code to your application.
> >>
> >> And of course it needs mbedtls in your project, or a reimplentation of
> >> http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/src/apps/snmp/snmpv3_mbedtls.c
> >>
> >> Ciao
> >> Dirk
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 7:21 PM Mário Luzeiro <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >> I'm testing SNMP sample from LWIP.
> >>
> >> What is the status of SNMP V3 implementation in LWIP?
> >> It only misses the user callback implementation or is missing something in the core?
> >>
> >> I tried to build with V3 enabled and I got errors on the use of mbedtls_sha1* and mbedtls_md5* functions.
> >> Am I missing some define?
> >>
> >> Mario
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lwip-users mailing list
> >> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
> >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lwip-users mailing list
> >> [hidden email]
> >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lwip-users mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>
>
>
> --
> pozdrawiam
> tomek
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users



--
pozdrawiam
tomek

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Status of snmp v3

Mario Luzeiro
So I found that the issues I have are because I'm using ST sha1_alt and md5_alt.
If I disable it and use the software version it works ok.

________________________________________
From: lwip-users <lwip-users-bounces+mrluzeiro=[hidden email]> on behalf of tomek wilkxt <[hidden email]>
Sent: 27 September 2019 10:17
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Status of snmp v3

> what is your target platform?

first STM32F107 but now GD32f107 is most the same but has more RAM
(96KB) and speed is 108Mhz.
LWIP current with repo
mbedtls-2.11.0.
NO SYS.


> ________________________________________
> From: lwip-users <lwip-users-bounces+mrluzeiro=[hidden email]> on behalf of tomek wilkxt <[hidden email]>
> Sent: 27 September 2019 08:39
> To: Mailing list for lwIP users
> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Status of snmp v3
>
> Hi
> A few days ago I started snmpv3 from this example and is work fine.
> Only i have my private mib file.
>
> czw., 26 wrz 2019 o 21:07 Dirk Ziegelmeier <[hidden email]> napisał(a):
> >
> > sorry, I don't have an idea at the moment. I only tested with SnmpB and that worked well.
> >
> > Ciao
> > Dirk
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 1:10 PM Mário Luzeiro <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Dirk,
> >>
> >> > it is technically complete
> >> thanks for all your work!
> >> I missed a bit some debug output as there are on other modules in LWIP but I am doing some manual debug.
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm trying to run the example code with v3 and use snmpwalk (linux tool) to test it.
> >> I changed the engine boot and time to be always 0 for test proposes.
> >> I need to change the engineID to 12 octets(bytes) so snmpwalk (and wireshark) will not complain.
> >>
> >> The far I can get is running this command and get this result:
> >> $ snmpwalk -v3 -l authPriv -u lwip -a SHA -A "maplesyrup" -x DES -X "maplesyrup" 192.168.1.3 -e 555555555555555555555555 -Z 0,0
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 = STRING: "lwIP example"
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 = OID: iso.3.6.1.4.1.26381
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (100158) 0:16:41.58
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.4.0 = STRING: "root"
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.5.0 = STRING: "FQDN-unk"
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.6.0 = STRING: "lwIP development PC"
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.7.0 = INTEGER: 72
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.2.1.0 = INTEGER: 1
> >> iso.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.1 = INTEGER: 1
> >> snmpwalk: Authentication failure (incorrect password, community or key)
> >>
> >> Why is it getting some data and then in the end reports some authentication failure?
> >> As I don't know about SNMP protocol, I am not sure if thats ok or something is wrong..
> >> Hope you can clarify me.
> >>
> >> Mario Luzeiro
> >>
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: lwip-users <lwip-users-bounces+mrluzeiro=[hidden email]> on behalf of Dirk Ziegelmeier <[hidden email]>
> >> Sent: 24 September 2019 19:18
> >> To: Mailing list for lwIP users
> >> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Status of snmp v3
> >>
> >> it is technically complete, it only needs proper implementation of the functions in
> >> http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/contrib/examples/snmp/snmp_v3/snmpv3_dummy.c
> >>
> >> which is the glueing code to your application.
> >>
> >> And of course it needs mbedtls in your project, or a reimplentation of
> >> http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/src/apps/snmp/snmpv3_mbedtls.c
> >>
> >> Ciao
> >> Dirk
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 7:21 PM Mário Luzeiro <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >> I'm testing SNMP sample from LWIP.
> >>
> >> What is the status of SNMP V3 implementation in LWIP?
> >> It only misses the user callback implementation or is missing something in the core?
> >>
> >> I tried to build with V3 enabled and I got errors on the use of mbedtls_sha1* and mbedtls_md5* functions.
> >> Am I missing some define?
> >>
> >> Mario
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lwip-users mailing list
> >> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
> >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lwip-users mailing list
> >> [hidden email]
> >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lwip-users mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>
>
>
> --
> pozdrawiam
> tomek
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users



--
pozdrawiam
tomek

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users