[bug #17574] Wrong define for UDP-Lite protocol (IP_PROTO_UDPLITE)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[bug #17574] Wrong define for UDP-Lite protocol (IP_PROTO_UDPLITE)

David GIRAULT-2

URL:
  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?17574>

                 Summary: Wrong define for UDP-Lite protocol
(IP_PROTO_UDPLITE)
                 Project: lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack
            Submitted by: None
            Submitted on: Mittwoch 30.08.2006 um 16:34 UTC
                Category: UDP
                Severity: 3 - Normal
              Item Group: Faulty Behaviour
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
             Open/Closed: Open

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

In both

include/ipv4/lwip/ip.h
include/ipv6/lwip/ip.h

the ip protocol number for UDP-Lite is defined as

#define IP_PROTO_UDPLITE 170

which is wrong.

In section "7. IANA Considerations" of RFC 3828 that describes the UDP-Lite
protocol it says
"A new IP protocol number, 136 has been assigned for UDP-Lite."

See http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=3828
or http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers

I guess that the wrong define dates back to the experimental days of UDP-Lite
but these are over since July 2004.

The wrong define effectively disables lwIP's support for the UDP-Lite
protocol.







    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?17574>

_______________________________________________
  Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/



_______________________________________________
lwip-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[bug #17574] Wrong define for UDP-Lite protocol (IP_PROTO_UDPLITE)

David GIRAULT-2

Update of bug #17574 (project lwip):

                  Status:                    None => Fixed                  
             Open/Closed:                    Open => Closed                

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #1:

Accepted this change.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?17574>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/



_______________________________________________
lwip-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel